In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court has permitted a ‘living will’ that will allow patients to withdraw medical support in case they slip into irreversible coma or a vegetative state.
Support Independent Media
The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free.
ContributeIf a person makes a ‘living will’ in her or his correct state of mind, it will dictate the terms of seeking voluntary euthanasia. The Bench put forward guidelines on who would execute the will and stated that the final nod for granting passive euthanasia would come from the medical board.
The constitution Bench of five judges agreed on ‘living will’ as a refuge for a person in coma or in a vegetative state who doesn’t wish to live. In 2011, the SC had recognised passive euthanasia in the Aruna Shanbaug case. This allowed for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients who are not in a position to make an informed decision.
Power NL-TNM Election Fund
General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.
Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?