The questions which followed the no-confidence motion, prove that we shouldn’t lose confidence in the Opposition just yet.
Our Prime Minister says a lot. Yet, when he does say a lot, he says nothing at all. His speeches are chock-full of rhetoric and clever snide remarks. Now this tactic might work wonders during election rallies, but in Parliament, it just seems quite out of place.
The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free.
ContributeFriday, July 20, turned out to be quite an eventful day in Lok Sabha. The Modi government faced its first no-confidence motion and came out victorious, re-establishing, without doubt, Parliament’s faith in the current government and giving it legitimacy in the final year of its term. In a debate that lasted 12 hours, the Opposition mounted a spirited attack and the treasury fought back with enthusiasm.
Even before the debate began, it was a foregone conclusion that the Bharatiya Janata Party government will come out victorious. BJP had the numbers, BJP had its allies, BJP had everything going in its favour. Some folks preemptively dismissed this whole exercise as a complete waste of time. It was anything but that.
What was interesting to watch was the debate and the kind of questions that were put forward throughout the day, followed by what answers the Prime Minister gave to the criticism put forward. On that front, the PM’s speech was utterly disappointing. What was also disappointing was the hot-takes the media seemed to be giving through the day. I mean… seriously people, get a grip on yourself.
This piece is an attempt to cut through the rhetoric and drama — the hugs and the winks — to see whether our PM really answered any worthwhile questions.
Putting the motion in context
The no-confidence motion which was finally accepted by the Lok Sabha Speaker was put in by Telugu Desam Party MP Kesineni Srinivas. Yes, the Indian National Congress also put in the motion, but there were other parties that did it too. Kesineni’s motion was accepted because his notice was received first by the secretariat.
Both TDP & Telangana Rashtra Samithi had tried to put in a similar motion in the preceding Budget session as well, but the attempt was thwarted. To be admitted, the motion requires more than 50 members to stand up and be counted by the Speaker. In the Budget session, the Speaker repeatedly mentioned how it was impossible to do so because of disruptions.
However, last Wednesday, in a strange turn of events the same motion was immediately accepted by her without really undertaking a physical count. Perhaps it would be legitimate to ask why the same wasn’t done in the previous session, but then we should just be thankful it was accepted at all.
Once the motion of no-confidence is accepted, Members of Parliament are given a chance to ask questions to the government, criticise it regarding any issue they feel is worth criticising and expect an answer from the PM. After the PM responds, a vote is cast through which the government has to prove its majority (more than 272 seats) in the Lok Sabha and that it is fit to rule.
While the BJP government sailed through that test, what was peculiar was that the PM, for all intents and purposes, did not answer many questions put forward by Opposition members.
List of unanswered questions
A group of vigilant Parliament watchers got together, saw the whole debate and noted down all the pointed questions which were asked by members through the day. The objective was simple: find out how many of these the Prime Minister answers.
In his 90-minute reply, the questions in bold are the only ones we heard PM Narendra Modi answering. Whether those answers were satisfactory or not is a different matter — it’s subjective — but even addressing these listed issues is worth noting. To say that the PM’s speech was disappointing would be an understatement.
What is also strange is that we saw the PM taking jibes at the Congress and Rahul Gandhi, but we did not see him address the others who actually asked these questions. The only person he directly named was Jaydev Galla who initiated the no-confidence motion debate. It is usually good form to address the people who ask the questions you’re replying to. That did not happen.
Prime Minister’s response
After looking at the list of the major questions asked, here is a gist of what the PM touched upon during his speech:
The points in bold can be considered as issues PM Modi responded to after they were raised by Members of Parliament. Special mention for Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and Anurag Thakur who intervened regarding the Rafale deal and Home Minister Rajnath Singh who addressed the mob-lynching incidents by condemning them and asking state governments to deal with the problem appropriately.
Coming back to the PM, it was peculiar that he did not mention demonetisation even once, nor did he mention Aadhaar while giving the savings figure. After looking at his speech, we got a basic overview of what issues the BJP government is going to talk about in the run-up to 2019 elections.
If we look beyond the hug, wink and general rhetoric from both sides, it’s easy to figure out that the Opposition did ask some tough questions and got very few answers in return.
General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.
Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?