Video
Explained: India’s British-era sedition law
As the JNU student row becomes a bigger debate on democracy, we look at the charges against JNU student union president Kanhaiya Kumar that sparked the whole “anti-national, anti-India” debate. Kanhaiya Kumar was charged by the police under Sec-124 A of the Indian Penal Code as the Delhi police termed his words “incendiary” and hence “seditious”.
In 1962 the Supreme Court had, read down the provision of Section 124A even as it upheld the constitutional validity of section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) despite it restricting the right to free speech and expression.
“…words and speech can be criminalised and punished only in situations where it is being used to incite mobs or crowds to violent action. Mere words and phrases by themselves, no matter how distasteful, do not amount to a criminal offence unless this condition is met,” the top court had ruled, holding the restrictions are within the ambit of permissible legislative interference and in public interest.
Also Read
-
WhatsApp university blames foreign investors for the rupee’s slide – like blaming fever on a thermometer
-
Let Me Explain: How the Sangh mobilised Thiruparankundram unrest
-
TV Newsance 325 | Indigo delays, primetime 'dissent' and Vande Mataram marathon
-
The 2019 rule change that accelerated Indian aviation’s growth journey, helped fuel IndiGo’s supremacy
-
You can rebook an Indigo flight. You can’t rebook your lungs