Let Me Explain: Majoritarianism and its impact on judicial neutrality

A sitting judge of the Allahabad HC recently made a communal speech at a VHP event, declaring that the country would function as per the wishes of the majority. 

In his 34-minute speech, Justice Shekhar Yadav endorsed majoritarian views and contributed to the othering of the Muslim community.

The judiciary is often seen as the final safeguard for upholding constitutional values. So, why are Justice Yadav’s remarks so significant in today’s political and social climate? What is the problem with judges associating with organisations like the VHP and RSS? And the larger question of the right-wing’s hold on the judiciary. 

Let’s break it down.

If you’re reading this story, you’re not seeing a single advertisement. That’s because we power ad-free journalism that’s truly in public interest. Support our work and subscribe today.