Reporters Without Orders
Reporters Without Orders Ep 363: Outlook magazine’s decline, state of political comedy
This week, host Pratyush Deep is joined by Newslaundry’s Priyanka Ishwari and The Quint’s Tanishka Sodhi.
They talk about their story on Outlook’s transformation from a news magazine that once reported hard-hitting stories and exposed some of India’s biggest scandals to a magazine that focuses more on features, poetry now.
Priyanka says several former Outlook journalists haven’t read the magazine in ages “because they don’t think it makes any noise anymore”.
Noting that Outlook hadn’t been doing great work after Vinod Mehta’s editorship ended in 2015, Tanishka says under its current editor, Chinki Sinha, the magazine has taken even a “more unpleasant turn”.
She also talks about her interview with comedian Daniel Fernandes in the wake of the Kunal Kamra controversy. She notes that even though the comedy landscape is booming, space for political comedy is shrinking because “people are scared”.
Tune in.
Timecodes
00:00:00 – Introduction
00:01:24 – Outlook’s vanishing edge
00:23:15 – State of political comedy
00:33:28 – Recommendations
Recommendations
Tanishka
Many adults take BCG vaccine in city not knowing they’re part of govt study
Scripted Videos by Content Creators Fuel Communal Discord and False Narratives
Priyanka
Uttarakhand first settlers: Full episode-1 | Series सभ्यता
Pratyush
Outlook’s vanishing edge: How a bold magazine lost its bite
Produced and edited by Saif Ali Ekram, recorded by Anil Kumar.
We have a new Sena project to report on police excesses across at least eight states in India, and how these impact everyday Indians. Click here to contribute.
Also Read
-
If your food is policed, housing denied, identity questioned, is it freedom?
-
The swagger’s gone: What the last two decades taught me about India’s fading growth dream
-
Inside Dharali’s disaster zone: The full story of destruction, ‘100 missing’, and official apathy
-
August 15: The day we perform freedom and pack it away
-
Supreme Court’s stray dog ruling: Extremely grim, against rules, barely rational