Explainers
Digital Policy series: Five ways to ensure intermediary liability doesn’t hurt free speech, privacy
By democratising knowledge and radically improving connectivity, the internet has enabled many positive developments over the past few decades. At the same time, it facilitates propaganda and fake news. This calls for content moderation on internet platforms.
The Indian government sought to fill this need by framing the Intermediary Guidelines Amendment Rules of 2018, which are set to be notified by January 15. The rules could fundamentally change how the internet works.
Many questions surround the need for intermediary liability. How, for one, do we assign legal responsibility for online content without infringing on free speech, or jeopardising privacy?
Here, we explain how a balance can be struck between a user’s free speech on the internet, the government’s mandate, and the operations of social media platforms.
Also Read
-
The Rs 444 question: Why India banned online money games
-
‘Total foreign policy failure’: SP’s Chandauli MP on Op Sindoor, monsoon session
-
On the ground in Bihar: How a booth-by-booth check revealed what the Election Commission missed
-
A day in the life of an ex-IIT professor crusading for Gaza, against hate in Delhi
-
Crossing rivers, climbing mountains: The story behind the Dharali stories