Let Me Explain
DMK’s fall in 2026: Anti-incumbency or something bigger?
The DMK’s defeat in the Assembly elections was not a simple one.
This was not just a change of government. 15 ministers lost their seats. Chief Minister M.K. Stalin lost the Kolathur constituency, which he had held since 2011. After three and a half decades, he will not be in the Assembly.
Why did the DMK get reduced to 59 seats? This cannot be explained as straightforward anti-incumbency.
There was no single dominant issue or wave of anger strong enough to produce this scale of outcome. The result instead reflects a shift in how the election was contested and how voters responded.
Let me explain.
Like Pooja’s LME? Support the show: https://rzp.io/rzp/support-lme
We take no ads, bow to no government or corporation, and answer only to you, the reader. This Press Freedom Month, pay to keep news free.
Also Read
-
TV Newsance 349 | Godi media presents: Good protester vs bad protester
-
Why are students in Jharkhand angry? JPSC-JSSC protest enters 14th day
-
Smokescreens, sneakers, and mass-reporting: Balen’s online machine against Nepal’s press
-
Rs 2.3 crore a day, 8 years: Yogi govt outspends Modi govt when it comes to ads
-
Before HC convicted him: How Tejpal was given access to the victim’s personal chats to build his defence