More Details, Please!

Why has Subramanian Swamy not emerged as the poster boy of the right-leaning middle class? And other questions.

In an editorial comment in its issue dated July 28, 1951, Economic Weekly (which preceded EPW) remarked: “Pandit Nehru is at his best when he is not pinned down to matters of detail”. In the formative years of India’s experiment with democracy, this edit was a scathing attack on the heady idealism of the Nehruvian policy framework which was seen as not taking into account the practical details and complexities of implementation. But more than any criticism, it was the actual play of democratic forces in the following years that brought a moderation in Nehru’s outlook, and Nehruvian public discourse acquired far greater detailing without surrendering its ideological core.

Fast forward to February, 1999. Just hours before heading for the Lahore bus journey, then Prime Minister A B Vajpayee was presiding over the centenary celebrations of Hindu College (Dr Subramanian Swamy’s alma mater) in Delhi University. He was heading a Right-wing coalition (NDA) which couldn’t be more ideologically different to the Nehruvian idea of India. Yet, his quite un-right-wing like peacemaking gesture towards Pakistan made him quip: “Politicians in power are a different creed”. Period. Democracy, with all its limitations, looks for details through an in-built mechanism of moderation. At the height of the upsurge of Hindu nationalist forces in the political power centres in the late Nineties, social scientist Ashis Nandy always sounded hopeful of damage control because he believed that democracy has an inherent tendency of moderating hardline ideologies. For all the self-assurance in Subramanian Swamy’s eyes, does he have an eye for “democratic detailing”? The settled certitudes of his brand of nationalist identity politics doesn’t seem to leave much space for alternative narratives of plural identities and even the more basic socio-economic and political challenges confronting the country.

The missing boy from the poster

What should intrigue you about Swamy is why he hasn’t emerged as the poster boy of a space that should have been his natural constituency. Swamy’s is an interesting case to examine the nature of political presence in the right-of-centre space in the country. And what’s more, the perceptions about his intellectual credentials as an economist says as much about public imagination of the right-wing space as it does about left liberal monopoly over academic acceptability and patronage.

Swamy has all the ingredients of emerging as the blue-eyed boy of the right-leaning middle class. He is a highly educated Brahmin and an economist of international standing. For a significant section of  the urban middle class who sneer at anpadh gawar politicians (Bedi-speak), he has credentials they would swear by. He has sought to unearth corruption in high offices and has led numerous anti-corruption campaigns.

Corruption is another galvanising issue for the middle class which has been gullibly led to simplify discourse with venal politicians and which is comfortable in its distance from more fundamental issues of political economy, dehumanising inequities and skewed capital-labour relations. Swamy has been vocal on the former and silent on the latter, the perfect combination to catch the right-leaning middle class imagination.

And then, he fulfills the third eligibility criterion for the rightist stewardship with his xenophobic rhetoric against non-Hindu plural identities in India. Swamy’s articulation of Hindutva should be music to the ears of NRIs who have been keeping the cash registers of right-wing organisations ringing in India.

Yet the puzzle remains, why has Swamy not emerged as the poster boy of the right leaning section of the middle class?

And yes, Swamy can write on economic issues beyond the blinkers of swadeshi economics of the right. With his long teaching and research career at Harvard behind him, Swamy might not need any more substantial credentials for being one of the eminent economists in the country. If doubt still lingers, just look at the obituary that he wrote for his Harvard mentor and Nobel Laureate, Paul Samuelson.


Yet, is it a surprise that he isn’t recognised as one of them? Not only for his preoccupation with things “political”, but also for an academic caste system where left liberals have to be the Brahmins and anyone taking a rightward turn is an “outcaste”. Swamy, again a puzzle here!

Swamy and His Friends: The Contested Idea of India

Swamy wants friends, but identical ones with a degree of sameness that militates against the Nehruvian idea of a secular India of plural identities. Swamy’s religious code has Hindutva numerals and for the rest, inclusiveness rests on a DNA-vetted Hindu ancestry. The league of religious exclusivity, the fodder for right-wing discourse. The tussle between these rival ideas of India is not new, and some may even frame it in a civilisational context (with no reference to Huntington’s The Clash of Civilizations). But the question has to get to the theme of democratic detailing – a code of co-existence and tolerating, if not respecting, pluralities. The democratic relevance for Swamy’s take on identity politics in India would help itself with that moderating force of democracy, that softening of hardened certitudes of religious narrative. And of course, addressing the questions that spring from no identity, but miserable human conditions.

Having his take on the complex mosaic of multiple realities of India, E M Foster had once said, “Every statement about India is correct. So is its opposite”. Democratic detailing lies in identifying and making space for as many opposites, not-so opposites and similarities. Multiple and fragmented, that’s how realities are in complex socio-cultural formations like India. Perhaps Swamy realises it too. He has details with him when he wants, Indian courts know that. Why is he so myopic with details of democracy and plural identities that sustain it? Hope he answers that someday.

All our articles are run through a software to avoid the possibility of unattributed work finding its way into Newslaundry.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (27 votes, average: 2.89 out of 5)

More from Anand Vardhan

Contribute Your Views
  • In the concluding paragraph the author is both way wrong! Neither the secularism was a brainchild of Nehru nor the Secularism itself is ‘secular’ enough in its tenets. We have had enough of debate on our Pseudo secularism. ”
    The league of religious exclusivity, the fodder for right-wing discourse”? What’s this? what Religious largeness otherwise you are talking about? I just conclude with one sentence. The author may ignore this only because he would have no answer for it? The question is why our “Secularism” is always perceived from Non-Hindu’s point of view but not from Hindu point of view.?

    • Karan Anand

      What is your point of view on ‘Secularism’? A non-hindu’s or a hindu’s. Please elaborate.

    • Niranjan

      I somehow always assumed secularism has only one point of view.

  • K R Vaishampayan

    Funny. The author concludes with – ”
    Why is he so myopic with details of democracy and plural identities that sustain it? Hope he answers that someday.” Has the author understood these details of Democracy in first place? What’s author’s take on the sham that passes off as Democracy in India? I am sure, he is one of the those intellectuals who know the Jargon but never the contents. God bless such intelligentia and India.KRV

  • The Author is making efforts to white wash the great expose done by Mr Subramanam swamy by raising non issue of ideology! sorry someother time friend!!

  • Leo Pius

    Anand, totally understand you when you say “Hope he answers that someday”. Many real admirers of Swamy have the same thought I am sure.
    What your nay-sayers here don’t realize is that you ‘could’ be as much an admirer of Swamy as they are … only you wish he is more inclusive on certain things … but then u run the risk of being scorned for being myopic on and unfair on our 80% community who may ironically share your views !!

  • vivek

    Without being judgmental, u rightly described the whole profile of Mr. Swamy and raised a valid question that In spite of having all those qualities that can make him a middle class hero,why is he not so popular among them….. Is it bcoz of his hardliner thoughts regarding certain thing tht wash away all his liberal qualities……?a good piece of writing..

  • theerga

    I presume you are a born and bred Indian national – I am,
    however a PIO – born in a Muslim majority country formerly a British colony, both
    primary & secondary education at a Convent school, at home a Hindu. Mine
    has been a long physiological battle to assert my identity, my roots. The ramparts I and my kind scaled were truly treacherous
    many have been lost to those battering rams. For those who have made it we now proudly
    tell anyone who cares to listen that when we die we will go to a Catholic/
    Christian FREE zone – as you might know that HEAVEN exclusively reserved for
    only those who except JESUS as their SAVIOUR. There! Is my reply to those child
    tormentors- venal Proselytizers! Unfortunately the narration does not have a
    happy ending. I now watch in despair the flip-toss of the same ABRAHAMIC cult coin;
    the Salafist and Wahabist now rule the roost.
    Day to day existence is even more challenging for my ilk – the
    infidel/kuffar/kafir –and we only know an abiding sense of foreboding. What I am trying to say – that unlike
    yourself- I and many others like me do not have the luxury of pontificating about
    the rectitudes of secularism and multiculturalism. If you truly believe that Proselytizers
    will leave you be – you deserve all that is coming your way. Careful! If you are not vigilant – it will all
    be too late when it’s gone. India is
    that unique civilization. For all its faults it is only CIVIL civilization. SS seeks a commonality for all who share this heritage. Yes – it is no longer a whole but a substantial part still survives – its need nurturing!

  • Niranjan

    The respect the 80% has for any right wing political leader is certainly reflected in the pattern of likes and dislikes for different comments, although much less pronounced as compared to youtube where the views are polarised to the such an extent that I suspect people run an organised network to systematically like/dislike and prasie/abuse different videos based on such issues.

  • Vinod Bhaskaran

    or maybe the right wing values he claims to champion is only a recent political ploy.. see