Recent

Round One To Narendra Modi

Modi’s Google+ Hangout proves that Congress has once again been out-manoeuvred by BJP in the social media space.

Any doubts about who the political badshah of social media is were dispelled Friday night with the blockbuster success of Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s Google+ HangOut, co-starring Ajay Devgn. The chat began late due to a technical glitch, but from then on it was smooth sailing. A total of 18 questions (out of a total of 20,000 received) were chosen to be asked and answered. The hashtag #ModiHangout trended for two days straight on Twitter. And even though the number of viewers was fuzzy the morning after with Modi’s website (www.narendramodi.in) claiming “millions” and the YouTube video (www.youtube.com/user/narendramodi/featured) reporting 15.23 lakh views, suffice it to say, as a TV channel reported, the site crashed due to heavy traffic.

On the day that former BJP minister, Maya Kodnani and others were being handed out life imprisonment sentences by a special court, Modi pointedly ignored Naroda Patiya and other inconvenient truths. Instead, the questions chosen ranged from the super-soft (the famous Modi half-sleeved kurtas) to the super-predictable (development in Gujarat). Biased? One-sided? Hell, yes. This was Modi’s game, and these were his rules.

The point of Modi’s hangout was not to answer awkward questions. This was not an interview. This was not a confessional. This was a virtual Town Hall gathering. This was image-building targeted at a youth demographic. This was reaching out to committed voters not only for the December 2012 assembly elections but for 2014 as well. This was about building bridges with the undecided. This was about projecting a modern, tech-friendly, accessible leader who “hangs out” with the guys.

The comparison and contrast, is inevitable. If 2014 is going to be a face-off between Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi, then Modi already has first-mover advantage on social media at least. Love Modi, hate Modi, it doesn’t matter. You cannot ignore him. Rahul, on the other hand, is loath to speak to media, mainstream or otherwise. While other Congress leaders like Digvijaya Singh are active on Twitter, Rahul is conspicuously absent on social media. His interactions are few and far between (Bhatta Parsaul, for instance). And even his hard-pressed loyalists are stumped when you ask: where does this putative prime minister stand on crucial issues such as foreign policy, development and national security?

The contrast between the BJP and the Congress on social media becomes even more glaring when you consider that the government has been in the news for all the wrong reasons. A move to block sites inimical to national security in the backdrop of the Assam violence led to the arbitrary blocking of individual journalists like Kanchan Gupta and Shiv Aroor for their apparent proximity to the BJP and its ideology.

Our Constitution places restrictions on freedom of speech in the interests of public order. Our penal code prohibits hate speeches. But when the government fails to provide an explanation on the blocking of individual sites of journalists opposed to it, then the obvious conclusion is censorship. The blocking of these sites was so bizarre, so unfounded and so blatantly opaque that for days the hashtag #GOIBlocks trended and of course the social media-savvy Modi was quick to change his display picture to a symbolic black box and tweet: “As a common man, I join the protest against crackdown on freedom of speech!”

It’s not just Narendra Modi, but the BJP that has understood the power and impact of social media. The BJP is the first political party to have a website and now, Narendra Modi is the first politician to hangout on Google+. In Tehelka, Kunal Majumdar reports on the BJP-Congress “online duel” (http://www.tehelka.com/story_main53.asp?filename=Ne080912Political.asp), but it’s an unequal battle in which the Congress is often outflanked and out-manoeuvred.

The BJP’s own leaders have a sizeable presence and following on sites like Twitter. They are bolstered by individual supporters who question the government on issues such as the Prime Minister’s silence on key subjects to Coalgate. And then there’s the ragtag army of “Internet Hindus” tweeting their particularly vicious brand of hatred. The BJP has never officially ratified this army, but equally, has never distanced itself from it.

Some like analyst B Raman are convinced that the Right has an organised presence on social media. Certainly, each time I have posted a tweet with the word NaMo in it, I can be sure that I will get a barrage of abuse – even if the tweet is innocuous. An article I wrote for The Hindustan Times on Twitter’s trolls mentioned not just right-wing trolls but also those who were abusive to the right-wing (http://www.hindustantimes.com/technology/SocialMedia-Updates/Running-away-from-the-trolls/SP-Article1-868619.aspx). Didn’t matter. The article earned me a ton of abuse, much of it personal, all of it from just one direction: Internet Hindus.

If Modi’s political opponents are worried about his hangout impact, they might want to take heart from one fact. Elections, particularly in a country like India, are not about to be decided by social media. But if the battle for minds in the virtual world has begun, let it be said, Round One to Modi and the BJP.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (28 votes, average: 1.71 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

More from Namita Bhandare

Fancy new clothes for Diwali - 5k
Gifts for friends and relatives - 10k
Newslaundry subscription for 15 days - Free
Free news for free - Priceless

This Diwali, we offer you free subscription to Newslaundry for the next fortnight. Click here to receive our newsletter. Support independent media. Happy Diwali!



  • chethanath

    Unfair to call brand every body as Troll.. You started it branding even a common and independent observer as troll. You are the loser and not the otherway around.. as this is your profession.

  • http://www.facebook.com/anurag.a.jain.3 Anurag A Jain

    fantastic article. unbiased. and BAMM, on the spot !!. plenty of typical naMO followers here too

    !

  • jai jawan

    to serve the mohammadans there are whores and eunuchs among us.. commonly known as journalists

  • Rakesh

    Wahh..anyone who is against ur views are bjp workers or “internet hindus” …Another sagarika ghosh.. Thinks themselves to be the part of katju’s 10%

  • Nam me kya rakha hai

    Namita Bhandare… in ur great career of Journalism, please post an article written by u on Black money allegations against the Gandhi family… u have been doing selective journalism to suit ur interest… no wonder the hungry and angry “troll” have selected u to feed for supper…

  • Firoz Ali

    bhag modi bhag

  • Firoz Ali

    Adidas ka next model >>>>>modi

  • Firoz Ali

    modi ko gussa kyu ataa hai

  • Indian

    well said

  • Indian

    You seems to envy advantage NaMo over Social Media. How about Indian MSM i.e print and electronic media? Is it not completely one sided ? You never grudge that. Who gave rise to ‘Internet Hindus’ ?

  • kalps1616

    Hi Namitha, I want to ask you, how many inconvenient questions have you (and your erstwhile employer) posed to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Manmohan Singh in the last eight years? All journalistic independence is dusted and polished only if it is BJP and that too NaMo. If MSM journalists would have done this to both BJP and Congress, you and your tribe need not have resorted to highly offensive term “internet hindus” to describe your criticists.

  • Indian

    well said

  • raj panchal

    then why dont you try and make an effort to know the facts about narendra modi by watching some of his interviews or listening to his speeches or even watching the g+ hangout??

  • Qwerty

    So what you are saying is that is not good to be a ‘proud Hindu’. What would you prefer maám ? ‘Self effacing Hindu’, ‘Browbeaten Hindu’ ?, ‘Terrified of minorities Hindu’? I suppose ‘proud Hindu’ disturbs the equanimity of the ‘intellectuals”. Sigh ! So be it !!!

  • pax brutalis

    proud of being hindu is a crime nowadays because hindus have the last right to the resources of this country.

  • pax brutalis

    In a country where people are dragged out of their homes in the middle of the night by police if they are critical of the government (like chidambaram did to his political rival’s son recently), in a country where government follies are covered by the sold MSM, anybody’s twitter account is blocked if they are critical of the “high command”, why are you so scared of anonymous views. After all we have the right to vote ANONYMOUSLY, or even that is tracked by the voting machines? Remaining anonymous is a right.

  • pax brutalis

    A leader reaching out to his people is a sin nowadays. No matter what Modi does is wrong. Get a life Namita.

  • Yuthika Sharma

    its a lame excuse for not saying sorry I misguided the reader and behaved as a troll for a bit in the name of unbiased journalism.

  • Yuthika Sharma

    Why don’t you speak for Hindus? Will that be considered a bias?

  • Yuthika Sharma

    Of course yes all secular people are hounded by haters, usually these hate-mongering is personal (aka cannot be verified by any independent observers) while the same secular people will overlook the very public hate-mongering of all hindus alike by all others ( recent example the Azad maidan overlook syndrome)

  • Firoz Ali

    we want freeedom from ambani n adani first