Psst…RTI officers…

Did the PM just send out a veiled signal to information commissioners?

While you were enjoying watching pre-Diwali crackers being burst under the bungholes of a few politicians and politically-affiliated private citizens over the last couple of weeks, a quieter smoke bomb was let off by the Prime Minister last Friday. And as I’ve been registering since I first travelled in an elevator, the quieter ones tend to be more deadly.

Delivered in his signature manner that cannot but inspire trust, Manmohan Singh told an audience of information commissioners – very Minority Report, very Philip K Dick-sounding that designation – that the Right to Information Act (RTI) does not provide provisions to infringe on a person’s right to privacy. “The citizens’ right to know should definitely be circumscribed if disclosure of information encroaches upon someone’s personal privacy,” he said, adding that a separate legislation on privacy was being talked about by an expert group.

On the face of it, there’s nothing wrong with this reminder about certain things not being anybody’s business but that of the individual. As Facebook users know, privacy settings come at various levels – information pertaining to oneself that’s for “public sharing” with everyone, information available to specific groups such as friends, and information available to only a few other individuals sent specifically to them. Information about oneself known only to oneself – say, the habit of peering into the neighbour’s bathroom or having a weakness for a quiet late-night raid of the refrigerator – doesn’t make it to social media platforms because the point of such information is not to bandy it about, but to keep it from becoming known to anyone but oneself.

Which makes the RTI hardly a social networking tool but an information-prying device. Its very function is to get information about someone – holding public office or who is affiliated to the government directly or indirectly – that is deemed to affect public functioning. The Prime Minister’s concern would have been more apt if the RTI was indeed used to find out the kink of a public sector company chief, or to find out whether a bureaucrat’s fondness for alcohol was confined to one or two glasses every evening or not, or whether an MP did indeed go to watch Ek Tha Tiger at the cinema where you thought that you saw him seven rows behind you.

The RTI is used to gather tucked-away information that should be in the public domain and isn’t, either because of bureaucratic shyness (read: being anal about matters such as “national security”) or is being kept away from prying eyes because there’s something dodgy that’s being kept under wraps. Misappropriation of public funds and schemes is a classic case where the RTI’s can-opener prowess has been invaluable. Almost a million people have sought information under this law last year and as more people take matters less for granted and understand the value of not taking everybody’s word for what it is, this number will grow.

So aren’t there frivolous RTI claims made? Of course there are. Demanding to know whether Sonia Gandhi is suffering from a disease or not, to my mind, is none of anyone’s business – even if this ignorance may result in confusion about who’s flying the UPA plane in her absence. A query about who’s next in charge in the UPA hierarchy is a valid question; not whether the chairperson’s secret smoking habit has busted her health.

But the Prime Minister let something more out as he told information commissioners not to entertain matters that infringe on people’s, well, metaphorical private parts. And this is where the hair inside my ear hidden away from public view stood up to catch what he was saying, “Blanket extension of the Act to such bodies (entities involved in public-private partnerships) may discourage private enterprises to enter into partnerships with the public sector entity,” adding as a trail-off that “a blanket exclusion on the other hand may harm the cause of accountability of public officials”.

What was that about? That the RTI can unlock secrets that have affected public functioning is known, especially to those folks listening to the PM’s valedictory address at the Seventh Annual Convention of the Central Information Commission (pause for breath). But if I’m one of those bureaucrats who usually come running, slip a mental salute-cum-“Salaam saab” before folding one’s spine to bend and then another origami-fold later crawl, what will I hear in the Prime Minister’s on-paper innocuous statement?

This is a rough translation of Singh’s statement as heard by a supplicant bureaucrat who doesn’t want to be shunted too often before he retires at his home currently being built in Ghaziabad:

“Guys, there will be some nosey-parkers out there who’ll want to use the RTI to find out why the government issued a tender and then decided to go into business with some company who didn’t necessarily make the grade at that point. What’s the point of going into all that, eh? What matters is that decent enough business ensues and the economy is in good shape. If we start getting caught up in explaining why we did this and not that, with that private enterprise and not the other one, we’ll not make any progress. Then, I’ll start blaming you for policy paralysis. But that doesn’t mean you don’t facilitate RTI inquiries that you think are fit and within the law’s parameters. Do what you believe is right. By the way, how are your son’s college studies in Delhi going?”

The PM has spoken earlier about how “all this negativity” isn’t good for the reputation of the country – and by “negativity” he hadn’t meant the cases of public corruption swirling about, but the media coverage of the pile-ups. Could it be that in a “nudge-nudge wink-wink, say no more, say no more” way, Manmohan Singh has, in a similar vein, told RTI officers to avoid “all this negativity” when they’re processing files of public-private partnership dealings? I’m sure I’m reading too much into it. But the real question is: did some information commissioners read too much into it too?


Image By- Swarnabha Banerjee

All our articles are run through a software to avoid the possibility of unattributed work finding its way into Newslaundry.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

More from Indrajit Hazra

Contribute Your Views
  • Shikha

    MMS is a shame for every indian. Even if sound rude, i ll say it- i always pray for the ultimate demise of this IMPOTENT fellow from the planet. A Beggar have far more self respect than this auto-immune entity. I never knew he likes biscuits so much.

    • Dammit

      how about if anyone say same thing for your own father/brother/husband… have right to criticise a person..but better rethink before you comment on someone, that too a PM of the country….no matter how much you hate him/her….

      • Shikha

        you want to talk personal then take it- I better loose such corrupt, dishonest and zero caliber father/brother/husband for ever than to be associated with them in any way. You know, you either belong to that generation of people or have that mentality where every good and reasonable argument is put in competition with something personal (” If it would have been your mother/sister”, “Can you say so about your family”. ” JUST THINK IF IT WAS YOUR FATHER/BROTHER/MOTHER” etc.) so that it can be diluted. Oh loser fellow, grow up and just check the heat of anger in new generation, they know what is right and wrong and need not to get preached by someone of your line. Got it! Apart from putting something of personal sort, come out with some rational argument. I am not interested in your this father/brother/mother.husband song. Sing it for someone else, not for me. Loser

        • Dammit

          First thing first….I didn’t start a personal was you who made a personal comment on a public article which actually had nothing to do with the substance of the article…Then the next thing you do is to make hypothetical assumption about “generation”…Even before you talk of generations and the so called anger of the people….better go back to school and learn some addicates on how to talk and comment on public forum…Also neither I was “singing a song” nor was interested in “preaching” you anything…but was just making my point in purview of the Indian culture and sensibilities I have brought up in….I very well know how to address the PM of my country, specially when I know that many nationals of other country shall form an opinion about the countrymen just after reading “one such comment” which alludes to killing of all those people who are corrupt..or praying that they may die soon….As a citizen of this country you enjoy right to criticise and oppose public figures..and reveal how “cultured” you are in your drawing room conversation……but when you comment on social media, the level of decency should be exercised..because many people don’t read your comment as a person but as being an Indian, if you have ever considered yourself to be one….else there is no difference between the insane comment made by you and Salman Khurshid…or do you really like to be kept in the category of such “potent” people..???

          Also as far as the rational argument is concerned….anything irrational can never be countered by rationality..and I can t stoop so low to be senseless like raise your standard and try to rub your knees hard…maybe you could write something sensible to get a reply from me…you see, there is always a next time…good luck…

          Finally, being in dictum of chivalry and wisdom….I spare you the horror from any reply for the expletive “looser” you used -which only proves your frustration and disbelief towards your own opinions and teases you back with wagging tongue-…but mind it…it was the first time..and better be the last…!!!

  • Joginder

    Yup. RTI is probably responsible for the mysterious fire which broke out in a North Block office yesterday, on 19th October. “We had all the info you wanted but the files have turned to ashes, you see.”