The urgent need for improved safety on India’s trains

2019 has already seen two train robberies, despite promises in Parliament and performance audits that flag vulnerable spots.

WrittenBy:Sashikala VP
Date:
Article image
  • Share this article on whatsapp

Two robberies on trains in the first three weeks of the year remind us of the old days when dacoits on horses used to raid trains—and remind us how unsafe our trains are, even 19 years into the new millennium.

subscription-appeal-image

Support Independent Media

The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free.

Contribute

The Railways in India run 12,617 trains, carrying an estimated 23 million passengers daily. In a December 2018 PIB note, the Ministry of Railways spoke about the “Upgradation of Security Criterion in Railways”. It pointed out that escorting of 2,500 trains (on an average daily) is done by the Railway Protection Force (RPF) while security for 2,200 trains is provided by the Government Railway Police (GRP). This means just 4,700 trains are “secured” and the rest are open to being raided by miscreants. Ironically, one of the trains targeted was the premium Duronto Express, supposedly under RPF protection.

A senior police officer with the RPF said that around the sector where the robbery took place, 80 trains pass at that hour. Of these, only 25 are manned by the RPF and about 25 by the GRP. They have deployed 30 more personnel after the incident. While the sanctioned staff strength of the RPF is 74,538, clearly not enough personnel are being deployed on the trains.

In 2018, Rajen Gohain, Minister of State for Railways, informed the Lok Sabha about the security measures taken by Indian Railways for the safety of passengers. These included setting up a security helpline number (184), surveillance through CCTV cameras provided at 394 stations, and an Integrated Security System consisting of surveillance of vulnerable stations through a CCTV network over 202 railway stations. Checks would also be made “from time to time” of unauthorised persons in trains and railways premises, and social media would be used to stay in touch with passengers.

In the first case of alleged robbery, the incident came to light through the Railways portal. Victims claim there were no officials on the train who came to help the passengers during the robbery. The incident took place at Badli, on Delhi’s outskirts, in the early morning hours of January 17. When the train was waiting for the signal to proceed to the main station in Delhi, a group barged into two AC coaches of the Jammu-Delhi Duronto Express. They allegedly looted cash, bags, phones and gold chains at knifepoint.

The Railways were alerted by a passenger complaint on its portal. He wrote: “Suddenly some 7 to 10 unidentified miscreants entered coaches B3 and B7 of the train. They were carrying sharp edged knives with them. They put the knife near to the neck of passengers and asked them to handover whatever expensive items they are carrying with them”.

While the ordeal lasted about 15 minutes, the robbers managed to jump off the train and escape before any security personnel showed up. In the passengers’ complaints, one report called it an irony that “neither staff nor security personnel were available there at the time of the mishap”. The passenger wrote: “… The attendant told us that there were no security personnel available in the train. We are not safe even in AC coaches and imagine the security in sleeper class and general coaches where passengers enter the train even without tickets…”

The senior RPF official said a few men have been apprehended in this case. “We know who have done it. And we will get the gang. They short-circuited the signal and the train had to stop”.

The next day, on January 18, another incident of armed robbery took place close to the Delhi station. Passengers returning from the Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj on board the Tata Jat Express were robbed by armed men. The incident took place before 2 am between Badli and Holambi Kalan, the Railways said. “The train was attended by RPF and GRP at Sonipat station at 01:55 hrs, where passenger of S-8, Ramnath Maurya, reported loot of ₹1,000 and small injury in left hand. He has been provided preliminary treatment at Panipat … He said that he will lodge (an) FIR at destination station. The train was not escorted by the RPF. The matter is being thoroughly investigated.”

Passengers alleged that mobile phones, jewellery and cash were looted from them at gunpoint.

Adhir Sharma, DG with the Railway Police, says there’s a need for more coordination between the different state police forces and the RPF. In spite of security in trains like Rajdhani, crime prevention is still an issue, he added.

The dearth or lack of proper policing was also pointed out in a performance audit report in 2011. In the context of enlarging dimensions of terrorist threats to the Indian Railways network, the report said: “Security management on the IR requires a paradigm shift in attitude”. It noted that “no effort” had been made to control access to stations: “Unauthorised and/or multiple entry/exit points on railway stations have not been closed”—making it easily accessible to passengers and non-passengers alike.

The report found that sensitive high-risk stations had not been decongested, “unnecessarily increasing security risk”. It said a test check revealed that “30 per cent of the authorised entry points on the 74 stations checked in Audit were not guarded by security personnel”. It also found that trains passing through Naxalite-affected or dacoity-prone areas were unescorted. “Audit observed that even the escorted trains ran unprotected at several intervals. No norms/guidelines were framed regarding the size of the escort party, whether it should be armed and which trains were to be escorted. The local Railway Administration decided the trains to be escorted based on manpower availability, threat perception, and importance of the train.”

The present mechanism for handling passenger-related crime on a moving train is not effective as the jurisdiction of occurrence of the crime is not identifiable, leading to problems in registering cases. Despite orders dating back to 1997, FIR forms are still not available with coach attendants, conductors and guards of several trains. A study conducted across the zones indicated that the total crime rate has more than doubled in the last five years. Railway stations, trains and goods sheds and yards were found to be most vulnerable to crime. “However, the Railway Administration failed to redeploy the RPF in accordance with the increase in crime rates.”

The senior official this reporter spoke to, however, does not believe that deploying more men will solve the problem. “The trains are so long and all are not interconnected. Even if a distress signal is made by the time personnel reach the men will get away”. This is why he thinks identifying the gangs and apprehending them is the solution.

This report was first published in Patriot.

subscription-appeal-image

Power NL-TNM Election Fund

General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.

Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?

Support now

You may also like