Supreme Court stays recovery of Rs 27 crore penalty imposed by SEBI on Radhika Roy, Prannoy Roy
The penalty was imposed for the NDTV promoters' alleged failure to disclose 'price-sensitive' information to shareholders.
The Supreme Court today stayed the recovery of a penalty of Rs 27 crore imposed on NDTV promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, along with their holding company, LiveLaw reported.
The penalty had been imposed by SEBI in December 2020 for NDTV's alleged failure to disclose "price-sensitive information" on loan agreements. On November 27, 2020, SEBI barred the promoters and RRPR Holding Private Limited from the securities market for two years.
The promoters had subsequently filed an appeal against the penalty at the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The Supreme Court today asked the Roys to cooperate in the disposal of the appeal by the tribunal, which has listed the matter for final hearing on April 6.
Appearing for the appellants, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that a lot of money is needed to run a company. "It is only Times of India and the other big channels which are functioning because they have a big network,” he said, adding that the two promoters had taken a loan of Rs 375 crore from ICICI Bank in 2008, which was repaid by Vishvapradhan Commercial Private Limited, a shell company, from which another loan was taken in 2009.
As against SEBI’s allegation that this led to the transfer of control to VCPL, amounting to a violation of regulatory norms, LiveLaw reported, Rohtagi claimed that the Roys have not transferred any shares.
LiveLaw quoted him as saying: “How can I transfer control without any transfer of shares? I have all the shares!...Who have I cheated? Why is there a penalty of Rs 25 crore and an individual penalty...This amounts to closing down the channel! We have no money!"
Solicitor-general Tushar Mehta argued that the promoters are not in a separate class who deserve special treatment. "The violations are of very serious nature," he said. "They are saying that they have not transferred the shares...Their shares are worthless. There is a direction by a statutory regulatory body that penalty has to be paid.”
Justice DY Chandrachud dismissed the arguments, saying it was "brash" of the tribunal to ask for a 50 percent deposit, LiveLaw reported.
Support Independent Media
The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free.
Contribute
The ‘R’ word in the case against NDTV
Power NL-TNM Election Fund
General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.
Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?