Court drops rape charges in Hathras case. Here’s what lawyers think

Unfortunate that semen considered conclusive evidence for rape in this country, says deceased Dalit woman’s lawyer.

WrittenBy:Akanksha Kumar

A special court in Uttar Pradesh on Thursday acquitted three persons and convicted one in the 2020 Hathras rape and murder case.

A 19-year-old Dalit woman had died at Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital in September, 2020, two weeks after she was allegedly gangraped and assaulted in Hathras. The incident had raised several questions on the law and order situation in UP under the Yogi Adityanath government, with the woman’s body being forcefully cremated by the police. Amid outrage, the case was later handed over to the CBI.

Over two years later, the special court has now dropped rape charges while convicting one of the suspects of culpable homicide and under the SC/ST Act. The CBI was unable to bolster its case against the suspects even though a delay in the lodging of FIR as well as collection of forensic samples was widely reported on. But why?

“This could be due to overreliance on circumstantial evidence,” said Mahipal Singh, among the lawyers representing the Dalit woman’s side. “It’s unfortunate that in this country, semen is considered as conclusive evidence for rape,” said Seema Kushwaha, the woman’s counsel.

Also see
article imageAfter forcible cremation of Hathras victim, UP proposes new guidelines for the future

Power NL-TNM Election Fund

General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.

Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?

Support now


We take comments from subscribers only!  Subscribe now to post comments! 
Already a subscriber?  Login

You may also like