The Rs 2 crore tweet: Inside corporate India’s legal war against online critics

Companies are using laws against defamation to remove viral posts that criticise their product or practices.

WrittenBy:Drishti Choudhary
Date:
Article image

On November 1, 2020, Suchir Kalra, a part-time professor at Ashoka University, tweeted about his less-than-satisfactory experience of dealing with BSH Household Appliances Manufacturing Private Limited, a subsidiary of BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, Germany, after buying a dishwasher. 

The appliance had a faulty part which led to Kalra and his mother engaging in a prolonged back-and-forth with the company over five months. The content of Kalra’s tweets included disparaging remarks, a demand for a refund, and a comment that the company behaved “like dictators”. 

BSH Household Appliances Manufacturing Private Limited responded by serving the Kalras a legal notice. “We have been sued for Rs 2 crore because we demanded Rs 5,685 refund which was taken towards incomplete and deficiency of service,” Suchir Kalra told Newslaundry.

The company filed a suit seeking the removal and takedown of defamatory tweets posted by defendants nos. 1 and 2 (referring to Kalra and his mother), a permanent injunction to prevent further disparaging material against the plaintiff company, and damages of Rs 2,10,00,000 for harm caused by false and defamatory content shared via emails and on X (formerly Twitter). The company has contended that the actions of the defendants (this includes X and the email provider) have damaged its reputation among the public, customers and affiliated companies globally. In an email response to Newslaundry, the company said, “The matter is subjudice. It is therefore inappropriate to comment at this stage. The company believes in the rule of law and has full confidence in our judicial system.”

But the Kalras’ case is one of many online consumer complaints that have turned into defamation cases, in which the companies are the plaintiffs.

In recent years, platforms like X have become places that individuals turn to in the hope of amplifying their voices in order to put pressure on a company to address the shared concerns. Many consumers have tagged companies on social media and this has helped arrive at resolutions and sometimes even get compensation. However, in some cases, like that of the Kalras, the response has been the opposite.

Subscribe now to unlock the story


paywall image

Why should I pay for news?

Independent journalism is not possible until you pitch in. We have seen what happens in ad-funded models: Journalism takes a backseat and gets sacrificed at the altar of clicks and TRPs.

Stories like these cost perseverance, time, and resources. Subscribe now to power our journalism.

  • Paywall stories on both Newslaundry and The News Minute
  • Priority access to all meet ups and events, including The Media Rumble
  • All subscriber-only interaction – NL Chatbox and monthly editorial call with the team
  • Stronger together merch – Fridge magnets and laptop stickers on annual plan

500

Monthly

4999

Annual
1001 off

Already a subscriber? Login

You may also like