The legal scholar says the new citizenship law is unconstitutional.
Khosla sat down with Madhu Trehan to talk about the constitution, the protests against the citizenship law, secularism, and the demand for a Uniform Civil Code.
He argues that the new law is unconstitutional. "One level is that they are distinguishing between citizens on the basis of religion," he says, "and the second level is that it violates a commitment to secularism."
Pointing to the absence of organised leadership of the protests, he says spontaneity cuts both ways. “The positive is it’s erupting everywhere, the negative is whether, in the long run, it will actually be channelised well."
On the demand for a Uniform Civil Code, he says, “One of the ironies of Indian history is that at the time Nehru and Ambedkar wanted a Uniform Civil Code. Today who wants it? Why have liberals given up on the Uniform Civil Code? Part of the problem is that we allowed those concessions in the first place."
We are an ad-free platform and rely on subscriptions to keep us floating. Consider supporting our work and pay to keep news free.
Join our YouTube membership programme. For more videos, go to Newslaundry.
Follow and engage with us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
The media must be free and fair, uninfluenced by corporate or state interests. That's why you, the public, need to pay to keep news free.
ContributeListen to this interview:
General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans together to focus on the issues that really matter to the voter. From political funding to battleground states, media coverage to 10 years of Modi, choose a project you would like to support and power our journalism.
Ground reportage is central to public interest journalism. Only readers like you can make it possible. Will you?